Strategic partnerships
Working with medical travel facilitators and healthcare technology vendors.
For international medical travel facilitators and for healthcare technology vendors. Every line below is quoted from the field notes, with its source.
I help operators make one standard work in many places. Advisory conversations and scoped pieces of work on operating standards, clinical quality systems, patient pathways, operations automation and cross-border care. I work as an independent practitioner, on method, alongside existing commitments.
From Consulting
My focus is the operating system around care: clinical governance, patient coordination, franchise standards, training and automation. Clinical decisions belong to qualified clinicians. My work is to make responsibility, evidence and the next action clear.
From About
Narrow scope, written output, something the team can pick up and use. You get a document your own people can work from: the standard, the map, the review instrument, the pilot design. Written for the person doing the job, not for a board pack.
From Consulting
01
The boundary
I bring method. I do not carry anyone else's material. I work on how things are done, not on what any organisation I have worked in did. No documents, no data, no names and no internal results travel with me into your room, and nothing of yours travels out of it.
From Consulting
I am not a clinician and I do not advise on clinical practice.
From Consulting
How I think is public. What an employer did is not.
From About
02
For international medical travel facilitators
One accountable owner for the whole patient journey, claims a patient can verify before travelling, and aftercare that survives distance.
From Consulting
An owner for every part of the care
The useful question is who has taken on each part of the work and what happens when a handover fails. This matters because the patient bears the risk of every gap between them. A coordinating partner can give the patient one contact for setting up the service. That does not make the coordinator a clinician or give it power over every provider. India earns trust when each part of the care has an owner the patient can reach.
From The trust gap is the market: how India can earn medical travel leadership
Every incentive on the table
So every commercial relationship that pays anyone for bringing this patient is stated to the patient, in writing, in the quotation. Every claim a partner makes about the hospital or its surgeons must match what the hospital itself can evidence, or the partnership pauses until it does. The desk should also be free to say, when it is true, that treatment nearer home is a reasonable choice.
From How India sells medical travel on a standard patients can check
A written price with its assumptions
Transparent medical tourism pricing requires a written scope that connects the quoted amount to the assessed service, names the exclusions and explains how changes will be handled. A price needs a scope that both sides can point to.
From Transparent medical tourism pricing starts with a written scope
I would start with two quotations for the same proposed scope, not two headline numbers from different websites. The useful price is the one whose assumptions the patient can understand.
A handover that carries what was said
The same named person stays the patient's non-clinical contact through the stay, with a written handover to the care team at admission covering language, diet, companions and every worry the patient raised during the sale.
From How India sells medical travel on a standard patients can check
At every handoff, three things must move with the patient: who owns them now, what has already been said to them, and what happens next. If any of the three is missing, the handoff is where you will find your losses.
From Lead to surgery: the seven handoffs where clinics lose patients
A complication plan written before travel
Complication management in medical tourism is a document, not a reflex. Write those six lines while nobody is bleeding. Every one of them becomes impossible to negotiate once somebody is.
Everything a well-briefed patient is told to demand is something a serious medical travel operator supplies unasked. That is the difference between a facilitator and an operator, and the position I want India to hold: not the cheapest destination, the most documented one.
From Complications abroad: the medical tourism plan you write before the first patient lands
A standard patients can check
A medical quotation carries a validity period long enough for the patient to speak to their own doctor. Another country can match India on price quickly. A sales standard that patients can check, backed by care that arrives as promised, is far harder to copy.
Sell every patient the decision you would defend in front of their own doctor.
From How India sells medical travel on a standard patients can check
03
For healthcare technology vendors (HIS, CRM, automation, voice AI)
Where automation belongs, where human judgement has to stay, and how to run a pilot that answers a real question instead of proving a tool.
From Consulting
Four gates before a purchase order
In short, write the process as it runs, measure it for four weeks, name one owner and plan the exit. Pass all four before any purchase order is raised. Write the exit before you write the purchase order.
From Buy, build or refuse: an automation decision that survives the demo
The demo and the worst week
So ask your own. Make them run your worst week, not their best case. Ask what the tool does when it is unsure, and whether it says so or guesses. The suppliers worth buying from answer all of that without flinching.
The demo is not lying to you. It is answering a question you did not ask.
From Buy, build or refuse: an automation decision that survives the demo
The CRM follows the journey
A CRM helps you record this. It will not decide it for you. Design the seven handoffs on paper first, in your own words, then make the software match. Doing it the other way round produces a very tidy system that maps a journey nobody actually runs.
From Lead to surgery: the seven handoffs where clinics lose patients
A pilot with a never list
Write the never list down before the pilot, in the contract if possible. It is much harder to add later, when the containment rate is being celebrated. A transfer that resets the conversation is worse than no bot. Who owns the prompts and the call flows. If you build six months of refinement into their platform and then leave, what comes with you?
One line, one use, one comparison. Run it for at least eight weeks and make sure that window includes a bad week.
From Voice bots in a clinic: the questions I ask before any pilot
Someone reads the replies
Here is the rule that saves you: if you cannot name the person who reads the replies and the hour by which they read them, do not send the message at all. Every automated message you send is a promise that somebody is listening at the other end of it. The tool is bought in an afternoon. The listening is a rota, and the rota is the actual product.
From Automating patient communication without automating the relationship
A written human veto
Write down the human veto. Not "clinicians remain in control", which means nothing. Name the role, name the moment, name the record. Publish what the machine must never decide. Candidacy. Consent. Dose and plan. Discharge. The system may prepare all four. A person decides all four, and the governance page says so in one paragraph a patient could read.
Optimism about what the tools can carry. Discipline about what they must not.
04
Start here
Write to me and say what you are trying to fix.
One paragraph is enough for a first message: what is going wrong, where you first noticed it, and what you have already tried. That is usually all I need to tell you whether a conversation is worth your time.
From Consulting
One call, no preparation needed from you. You describe what is going wrong and I ask the questions an operator would ask. If I am not the right help, I will say so in that call.
From Consulting